Please fill in your rating: *

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Somewhat Agree	Somewhat Disagree	Strongly Disagree	Not Applicable
Faculty was knowledgeable, effective and clear in the delivery of content:	Faculty was knowledgeable, effective and clear in the delivery of content: - Strongly Agree	Faculty was knowledgeable, effective and clear in the delivery of content: - Agree	Faculty was knowledgeable, effective and clear in the delivery of content: - Somewhat Agree	Faculty was knowledgeable, effective and clear in the delivery of content: - Somewhat Disagree	Faculty was knowledgeable, effective and clear in the delivery of content: - Strongly Disagree	Faculty was knowledgeable, effective and clear in the delivery of content: - Not Applicable
Facutly and moderator were responsive to audience input.	Facutly and moderator were responsive to audience input. - Strongly Agree	Facutly and moderator were responsive to audience input. - Agree	Facutly and moderator were responsive to audience input. - Somewhat Agree	Facutly and moderator were responsive to audience input. - Somewhat Disagree	Facutly and moderator were responsive to audience input. - Strongly Disagree	Facutly and moderator were responsive to audience input. - Not Applicable
Learning Objective #1 was met: Distinguish trauma-informed care from healing centered engagement strategies.	Learning Objective #1 was met: Distinguish trauma-informed care from healing centered engagement strategies. - Strongly Agree	Learning Objective #1 was met: Distinguish trauma-informed care from healing centered engagement strategies. - Agree	Learning Objective #1 was met: Distinguish trauma-informed care from healing centered engagement strategies. - Somewhat Agree	Learning Objective #1 was met: Distinguish trauma-informed care from healing centered engagement strategies. - Somewhat Disagree	Learning Objective #1 was met: Distinguish trauma-informed care from healing centered engagement strategies. - Strongly Disagree	Learning Objective #1 was met: Distinguish trauma-informed care from healing centered engagement strategies. - Not Applicable
Learning Objective #2 was met: Apply a salutogenic approach to current policies and procedures.	Learning Objective #2 was met: Apply a salutogenic approach to current policies and procedures. - Strongly Agree	Learning Objective #2 was met: Apply a salutogenic approach to current policies and procedures. - Agree	Learning Objective #2 was met: Apply a salutogenic approach to current policies and procedures. - Somewhat Agree	Learning Objective #2 was met: Apply a salutogenic approach to current policies and procedures. - Somewhat Disagree	Learning Objective #2 was met: Apply a salutogenic approach to current policies and procedures. - Strongly Disagree	Learning Objective #2 was met: Apply a salutogenic approach to current policies and procedures. - Not Applicable
Learning Objective #3 was met: Practice how to apply a healing-centered engagement approach by analyzing a case study.	Learning Objective #3 was met: Practice how to apply a healing-centered engagement approach by analyzing a case study. - Strongly Agree	Learning Objective #3 was met: Practice how to apply a healing-centered engagement approach by analyzing a case study. - Agree	Learning Objective #3 was met: Practice how to apply a healing-centered engagement approach by analyzing a case study. - Somewhat Agree	Learning Objective #3 was met: Practice how to apply a healing-centered engagement approach by analyzing a case study. - Somewhat Disagree	Learning Objective #3 was met: Practice how to apply a healing-centered engagement approach by analyzing a case study. - Strongly Disagree	Learning Objective #3 was met: Practice how to apply a healing-centered engagement approach by analyzing a case study. - Not Applicable
Presentation was relevant to your needs or interests.	Presentation was relevant to your needs or interests. - Strongly Agree	Presentation was relevant to your needs or interests. - Agree	Presentation was relevant to your needs or interests. - Somewhat Agree	Presentation was relevant to your needs or interests. - Somewhat Disagree	Presentation was relevant to your needs or interests. - Strongly Disagree	Presentation was relevant to your needs or interests. - Not Applicable
Content met expectations.	Content met expectations. - Strongly Agree	Content met expectations. - Agree	Content met expectations. - Somewhat Agree	Content met expectations. - Somewhat Disagree	Content met expectations. - Strongly Disagree	Content met expectations. - Not Applicable
Content was current.	Content was current. - Strongly Agree	Content was current. - Agree	Content was current. - Somewhat Agree	Content was current. - Somewhat Disagree	Content was current. - Strongly Disagree	Content was current. - Not Applicable
Satisfactory and quality education materials.	Satisfactory and quality education materials. - Strongly Agree	Satisfactory and quality education materials. - Agree	Satisfactory and quality education materials. - Somewhat Agree	Satisfactory and quality education materials. - Somewhat Disagree	Satisfactory and quality education materials. - Strongly Disagree	Satisfactory and quality education materials. - Not Applicable
Technology was easy to use.	Technology was easy to use. - Strongly Agree	Technology was easy to use. - Agree	Technology was easy to use. - Somewhat Agree	Technology was easy to use. - Somewhat Disagree	Technology was easy to use. - Strongly Disagree	Technology was easy to use. - Not Applicable
Course registration process was easy to use.	Course registration process was easy to use. - Strongly Agree	Course registration process was easy to use. - Agree	Course registration process was easy to use. - Somewhat Agree	Course registration process was easy to use. - Somewhat Disagree	Course registration process was easy to use. - Strongly Disagree	Course registration process was easy to use. - Not Applicable
Adminitstrative staff were responsive to questions or concerns.	Adminitstrative staff were responsive to questions or concerns. - Strongly Agree	Adminitstrative staff were responsive to questions or concerns. - Agree	Adminitstrative staff were responsive to questions or concerns. - Somewhat Agree	Adminitstrative staff were responsive to questions or concerns. - Somewhat Disagree	Adminitstrative staff were responsive to questions or concerns. - Strongly Disagree	Adminitstrative staff were responsive to questions or concerns. - Not Applicable
Content presented in this session will affect future treatment decisions.	Content presented in this session will affect future treatment decisions. - Strongly Agree	Content presented in this session will affect future treatment decisions. - Agree	Content presented in this session will affect future treatment decisions. - Somewhat Agree	Content presented in this session will affect future treatment decisions. - Somewhat Disagree	Content presented in this session will affect future treatment decisions. - Strongly Disagree	Content presented in this session will affect future treatment decisions. - Not Applicable

This activity will assist in the improvement of my: *

Competence

Performance

Patient Outcomes

Knowledge

Was bias shown toward commercial product or service? *

No

Maybe

Yes

If yes, please explain: *

Will the content learned from this activity impact your practice? *

Yes

No

If yes, please provide two examples of the applicable information:

If no, what are the barriers to application of this information:

What educational information do you need to improve your practice?

What challenges are you facing in your practice?

Comments:

Amount of time taken to complete this activity:

Leave this field blank